# Autoduality holds for a degenerating abelian variety

- Jesse Leo Kass
^{1}Email authorView ORCID ID profile

**4**:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40687-017-0116-y

© The Author(s) 2017

**Received: **3 June 2017

**Accepted: **19 July 2017

**Published: **6 December 2017

## Abstract

We prove that certain degenerate abelian varieties that include compactified Jacobians, namely stable semiabelic varieties, satisfy autoduality. We establish this result by proving a comparison theorem that relates the associated family of Picard schemes to the Néron model, a result of independent interest. In our proof, a key fact is that the total space of a suitable family of stable semiabelic varieties has rational singularities.

## Keywords

## Mathematics Subject Classification

Here we construct an isomorphism analogous to (1) in which the abelian variety is replaced by a singular projective variety, namely a stable semiabelic variety. Stable semiabelic varieties are degenerate abelian varieties studied in the moduli theory of abelian varieties in the work of, e.g., Alexeev, Nakamura, and Olsson. An important example of these varieties is the compactified Jacobian of a nodal curve, or moduli space of degree *d* rank 1, torsion-free sheaves which are required to satisfy a semistability condition when \(X_0\) is reducible. A stable semiabelic variety is acted upon by a natural semiabelian variety \(J^{\underline{0}}\) which equals the moduli space of multidegree 0 line bundles when \(\overline{J}\) is a compactified Jacobian.

Because \(\overline{J}_0\) is a (possibly reducible) projective variety, we can form the (identity component of the) Picard scheme \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}_0/k)\), and Main Theorem of this paper is that there is an isomorphism from \(J_0^{\underline{0}}\) to \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}_0/k)\) that is analogous to (1):

### Main Theorem

(Autoduality) The autoduality theorem holds for stable semiabelic varieties.

These are Corollaries 3 (for stable semiablic varieties) and 9 (for compactified Jacobians). (See the beginning of Sect. 3 for a discussion on the relation with stable semiabelic varieties).

Main Theorem has special significance when the stable semiabelic variety is a compactified Jacobian \(\overline{J}_{0}\) of a nodal curve \(X_0\). For such a \(\overline{J}_{0}\), one consequence of the theorem is that \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}_0/k)\) depends only on the curve \(X_0\), rather than on the compactified Jacobian \(\overline{J}_0\). Recall \(\overline{J}_0\) depends on a choice of semistability condition, and different choices produce different schemes. For example, when \(X_0\) equals two curves meeting in 3 nodes, one choice produces a \(\overline{J}_0\) with two irreducible components, while another produces a \(\overline{J}_0\) with three irreducible components. (See [26, Example 13.1(3)].)

The autoduality theorem was known when \(\overline{J}_0\) is a fine compactified Jacobian variety by work we now review. Recall that a compactified Jacobian is said to be fine when every semistable sheaf is stable, so that \(\overline{J}_{0}\) represents a natural functor. Otherwise we say that \(\overline{J}_{0}\) is coarse. The autoduality theorem was proven by Esteves et al. [15, Theorem (Autoduality), pp. 5–6] when \(\overline{J}_{0}\) is the compactified Jacobian of an irreducible curve. This result was extended by Esteves and Rocha [17, pp. 414–415] to treelike curves and by Melo et al. [23, Theorem C] to arbitrary nodal curves. These authors also prove results for curves with worse singularities than nodes, and their work has been generalized in various ways, e.g., to curves with planar singularities [4] and to results about the compactified Picard scheme of \(\overline{J}_0\) [5, 16, 24]. The result is new when \(\overline{J}_0\) is a coarse compactified Jacobian or a stable semiabelic variety that is not a compactified Jacobian.

In the case of fine compactified Jacobians, the proof of autoduality we give here is different from previous proofs and runs as follows. A given \(\overline{J}_{0}\) can be realized as the closed fiber of a family \(\overline{J} \rightarrow S\) over \(S := {{\text {Spec}}}( k[[t]])\) such that the generic fiber is a principally polarized abelian variety. We first compare the family \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)/S\) with the Néron model of its generic fiber. (The Néron model is an extension of the generic fiber to a *S*-scheme that satisfies a universal mapping property.) Thus, pick a suitable resolution of singularities \(\beta :\widetilde{J} \rightarrow \overline{J}\) and consider the pullback homomorphism \(\beta ^* :{\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S) \rightarrow {\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\). In Proposition 5, we prove \(\overline{J}\) has rational singularities, and this implies the differential of \(\beta ^*\)—and hence \(\beta ^{*}\) itself—is an isomorphism. A theorem of Pépin states that \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\) is the identity component of the Néron model, so we conclude that:

### Theorem

(Comparison) \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)/S\) is the identity component of the Néron model of its generic fiber.

This theorem is Theorem 1 below, and it immediately implies Main Theorem because the universal mapping property of the Néron model implies that the classical autoduality isomorphism of the generic fiber extends over all of *S*. The comparison theorem is sharp in a sense described in Remark 2.

The proof just sketched deduces autoduality from the fact that \(\overline{J}_0\) deforms in a family \(\overline{J}/S\) such that \(\overline{J}\) has rational singularities. By contrast, in the case where \(\overline{J}_0\) is a fine compactified Jacobian, the result is deduced from a description of \(\overline{J}_0\) coming from the presentation scheme in [15], from autoduality for irreducible curves in [17], and from the computation of the cohomology of a universal family of sheaves, a computation done by putting \(\overline{J}_0\) into a suitable miniversal family, in [23]. In particular, previous work established autoduality for the compactified Jacobian using descriptions of the compactified Jacobian as a moduli space, while the present work establishes autoduality using facts about the singularities of the total space \(\overline{J}\).

A word about the characteristic. In this paper we assume:

### Assumption

*R* is a discrete valuation ring with characteristic 0 residue field *k*.

We need to make this assumption because we make use of properties of rational singularities. There is a well-developed theory of rational singularities in characteristic zero, but not in positive characteristic (except for the case of surface singularities). To extend the proof of the main results of this paper to allow *k* to have positive characteristic, it would be enough to prove that the total space \(\overline{J}\) admits a rational resolution and that Corollary 7 remains valid. Based on conversations with singularity theorists, the author believes that these properties are expected to hold in positive characteristic, but there is no written reference for such results.

## 1 Notation and conventions

A **curve**
\(X_0/{{\text {Spec}}}(k)\) over a field *k* is a *k*-scheme that is geometrically connected, geometrically reduced, 1-dimensional, and proper over *k*. We set \(g := 1-\chi (X_0, {\mathcal O}_{X_0})\) equal to the **arithmetic genus**. When \(k=\overline{k}\) is algebraically closed, we say that \(X_0/{{\text {Spec}}}(k)\) is **nodal** if the completed local ring \(\widehat{{\mathcal O}}_{X_0, x_0}\) of \(X_0\) at a point not lying in the *k*-smooth locus is isomorphic to *k*[[*x*, *y*]] / (*xy*). In general, we say that \(X_0/{{\text {Spec}}}(k)\) is nodal if \(X_0 \otimes _{k} \overline{k}\) is nodal. A **family of curves** over a scheme *T* is a *T*-scheme *X* / *T* that is proper and flat over *T* and such that the fibers of \(X \rightarrow T\) are curves. If the fibers are nodal curves, then we say *X* / *T* is a **family of nodal curves**. We say that a family of curves *X* / *S* is **regular** if *X* is a regular scheme (i.e., at every closed point, the Zariski tangent space has dimension equal to the local Krull dimension of *X*).

## 2 Comparison with the Néron model

Here we prove a comparison theorem which states that a suitable family of Picard schemes \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)\) is isomorphic to the identity component of the Néron model of its generic fiber, and we use this theorem in later sections to prove autoduality. We apply the comparison theorem when \(\overline{J}/S\) is a family of stable semiabelic varieties or compactified Jacobians, but we work in slightly greater generality in this section: We work with a family \(\overline{J}/S\) that satisfies Hypothesis 1 below, and in later sections, we prove that the hypothesis is satisfied by the families of interest.

For the remainder of this section, we fix the spectrum *S* of a discrete valuation ring *R* with field of fractions *K* and residue field *k* that we assume has characteristic zero, and let \(\overline{J}/S\) be a *S*-flat and *S*-projective *S*-scheme such that the generic fiber \(\overline{J}_{K}\) is a torsor for an abelian variety of dimension *g* and the following hypothesis is satisfied:

### Hypothesis 1

The scheme \(\overline{J}\) has rational singularities, and for all *i*, the higher direct image \(R^{i}p_{*}\mathcal {O}_{\overline{J}}\) under the projection \(p :\overline{J} \rightarrow S\) is a locally free \(\mathcal {O}_{S}\)-module of rank \(\left( {\begin{array}{c}g\\ i\end{array}}\right) \) whose formation commutes with base change.

Because \(\overline{J}/S\) satisfies Hypothesis 1, we can form the associated **family of Picard schemes**
\({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S)/S\). This is the *S*-scheme that represents the fppf sheafification of the functor that assigns to a *S*-scheme *T* the set \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}_{T})\) of isomorphism classes of line bundles on \(\overline{J}_{T}\). The family of Picard schemes exists as a (possibly nonseparated) *S*-group space that is locally of finite presentation over *S*. Indeed, because the formation of the pushforward \(p_{*} {\mathcal O}_{\overline{J}}\) by \(p:\overline{J} \rightarrow S\) commutes with base change, this representability result is [28, (1.5)]. Because \(R^{1}p_{*} {\mathcal O}_{\overline{J}}\) is locally free and its formation commutes with base change, \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S)/S\) contains the **identity component**
\({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)/S\), an open *S*-subgroup scheme that is of finite type and smooth over *S* and has the property that the fibers of \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S) \rightarrow S\) are the identity components of the fibers of \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S) \rightarrow S\) by [20, Corollary 5.14, Proposition 5.20].

**Néron model**of its generic fiber. The Néron model

*N*/

*S*of \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}_K/K)\) is a

*S*-scheme that is smooth over

*S*, contains \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}_K/K)\) as the generic fiber, and satisfies the Néron mapping property; that is, for every smooth morphism \(T \rightarrow S\) the natural map

*N*/

*S*exists and is separated and of finite type over

*S*[6, Corollary 2, Section 9.7]. The

**identity component**\(N^{\underline{0}}/S\) is defined to be the complement of the connected components of the special fiber \(N_{0}\) that do not contain the group identity element \(e \in N_{0}(k)\). By construction, \(N^{\underline{0}}\) is an open

*S*-group subscheme of

*N*such that the fibers of \(N^{\underline{0}} \rightarrow S\) are connected.

*S*-morphism

### Theorem 1

(Comparison) The morphism (4) is an isomorphism.

### Proof

We prove this theorem by choosing a regular *S*-model \(\widetilde{J}/S\) of \(\overline{J}/S\), using a result of Pépin to relate the family of Picard schemes of \(\widetilde{J}/S\) to the Néron model and then using the rational singularities hypothesis to show that \(\widetilde{J}/S\) and \(\overline{J}/S\) have isomorphic families of Picard schemes.

*g*and its formation commutes with base change.

This shows that the hypothesis of [28, (1.5)] holds for \(\widetilde{J}\), so the family of Picard schemes \({\text {Pic}}(\widetilde{J}/S)/S\) exists as a *S*-group space that is locally of finite presentation over *S*. The identity component \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\) is canonically isomorphic to the identity component of the Néron model of its generic fiber by Pépin’s result [27, Proposition 10.3]. The claimed result is not exactly the statement of the proposition, but we can deduce it as follows. The proposition states that the identity component of the Néron model is canonically isomorphic to the identity component of the *S*-group smoothening (in the sense of [6, p. 174]) of the closure of \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}_{K}/K)\) in \({\text {Pic}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\). The relevant closure is its own *S*-group smoothening because the closure is *S*-flat (as the generic fiber is dense) and the fibers of the morphism to *S* are smooth (by [20, Corollay 5.15] and the fact that \(R^{1} (p \circ \beta )_{*}{\mathcal O}_{\widetilde{J}}\) satisfies the analog of Corollary 7). Finally, \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\) is contained in the closure because \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\) is smooth (and hence flat) over *S*. In particular, \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\) is the identity component of the closure, deducing the desired result from Pépin’s proposition.

*S*-subgroup scheme of \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\) is \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\widetilde{J}/S)\) itself, and so \(\beta ^*\) is an isomorphism. \(\square \)

### Remark 2

The comparison theorem is sharp in the following sense. The theorem shows that the identity component of the Néron model is isomorphic to an open *S*-subgroup scheme of \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S)\), and one can ask whether there is a larger open subgroup scheme that is isomorphic to the Néron model. Without additional hypotheses, no such larger subgroup scheme exists. We demonstrate this with the following example, which is a compactified Jacobian.

Let *S* equal \({{\text {Spec}}}(\mathbf C [t]_{(t)})\) (the localization of \(\mathbf C [t]\) at (*t*)), *X* the minimal regular model of \({{\text {Spec}}}(R[x,y]/(y^2-x^3-x^2-t^2))\), and \(\overline{J}/S\) the family of degree 0 compactified Jacobians associated with any family of ample line bundles. (A computation shows that in this special case the semistability condition is independent of the ample line bundle.) Observe that \({{\text {Spec}}}(R[x,y]/(y^2-x^3-x^2-t^2))\) has a singularity at the closed point (*x*, *y*, *t*), so *X* is a blow up of a compactification of \({{\text {Spec}}}(R[x,y]/(y^2-x^3-x^2-t^2))\), and a computation shows that the special fiber \(X_0\) of *X* consists of two rational curves meeting in two nodes.

The family *X* / *S* is a family of genus 1 nodal curves with reducible special fiber, and \(\overline{J}/S\) is a family of genus 1 curves with irreducible special fiber. Since \(\overline{J}/S\) is a family of curves, \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)\) is flat over *S*, and thus, \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)\) is equal to the closure of its generic fiber in \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S)\). We can conclude that \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)/S\) is the largest subgroup scheme of \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S)\) that contains the identity component \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)\) and is isomorphic to an open subgroup scheme of the Néron model (for any open scheme of the Néron model has dense generic fiber by *S*-smoothness).

The identity component \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)\) is not, however, the Néron model of its generic fiber because the Néron model has disconnected special fiber. (The elliptic curve \(J_K\) has reduction type \(I_2\) in Kodaira’s classification [29, Theorem 8.2].) The theorems [27, Théoréme 9.3] and [28, Théoréme 8.1.4] suggest that one should not ask for an open subgroup of \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S)\) isomorphic to the Néron model, but rather for an open subgroup scheme whose maximal separated quotient is isomorphic to the Néron model. In the example just discussed, \({\text {Pic}}(\overline{J}/S)\) is separated, so again no such open subgroup scheme exists.

## 3 Autoduality for degenerate abelian varieties

Here we use the comparison theorem, Theorem 1, to prove that stable semiabelic varieties, certain degenerations of principally polarized abelian varieties, satisfy an autoduality theorem. Stable semiabelic varieties include many compactified Jacobians, but we also give a self-contained treatment of the autoduality theorem for compactified Jacobians in later sections. The reader interested only in compactified Jacobians is advised to skip ahead to Sect. 3.

In this section, *S* is the spectrum of a discrete valuation ring *R* with field of fractions *K* and residue field *k* that we assume has characteristic zero.

The degenerations we study are degenerations to a **stable semiabelic variety**, a type of degeneration defined by Alekeev and Nakamura in [1]. (Note: In loc. cit. the term “stable quasiabelian” is used instead, but currently “stable semiabelic” is more commonly used.) In proving that stable semiabelic varieties satisfy autoduality, we make use of relatively few properties of these varieties. Alexeev and Nakamura construct stable semiabelic varieties using Mumford’s construction: Starting with a family of semiabelian varieties *G* / *S*, they form an explicit sheaf of graded \(\mathcal {O}_{G}\)-algebras \(\mathcal {A}\), construct an action of a discrete group *Y* on \({\text {Proj}}(\mathcal {A})\), and then define the quotient of \({\text {Proj}}(\mathcal {A})\) by *Y* to be the associated family of stable semiabelic varieties \(\overline{J}/S\). In particular, the construction provides an explicit description of the local structure of \(\overline{J}\), and we use that description to prove that \(\overline{J}\) satisfies Hypothesis 1, and then, we prove the autoduality theorem using Theorem 1.

- (1)
The dimension of each irreducible component of \(\overline{J}_0\) is equal to the dimension of \(J^{\underline{0}}_{0}\);

- (2)
There are only finitely many orbits for the \(J^{\underline{0}}_{0}\)-action;

- (3)
The stabilizer of every point of \(\overline{J}_{0}\) is connected, reduced, and contained in the maximal multiplicative torus of \(J^{\underline{0}}_{0}\);

- (4)
\(\overline{J}_0\) is seminormal.

*R*, the pair \((\overline{J}_{K}, J^{\underline{0}}_{K})\) can be extended to a pair of

*S*-flat

*S*-schemes \((\overline{J}, J^{\underline{0}})\) such that \(J^{\underline{0}}\) is a family of semiabelian varieties acting on \(\overline{J}\) with special fiber a stable semiabelic variety.

The extension \((\overline{J}, J^{\underline{0}})\) is not unique, but it becomes unique if one requires that \(\Theta _{K}\) extends in a suitable way. By construction, \(\Theta _{K}\) extends to a family of effective Cartier divisors \(\Theta \subset \overline{J}\). The extension is unique if we require that the special fiber \(\Theta _0 \subset \overline{J}_0\) is ample and does not contain an orbit of \(J^{\underline{0}}_{0}\), i.e., that \((\overline{J}_{0}, \Theta _{0}, J^{\underline{0}})\) is a family of stable semiabelic pairs.

*x*. We prove that this isomorphism extends for stable semiabelic varieties:

### Corollary 3

### Proof

We show that \(\overline{J}\) satisfies Hypothesis 1 and then deduce autoduality using the universal property of the Néron model. To see that Hypothesis 1 is satisfied, observe that the completed local ring of \(\overline{J}\) at a closed point is isomorphic to the completed local ring of an affine toric variety, essentially by the construction of \(\overline{J}\) [1, Theorem 3.8(i)] (in that theorem, it is assumed that the special fiber \(J^{\underline{0}}_0\) is a multiplicative torus, but the local structure for general \(J^{\underline{0}}_{0}\) is the same as for \(J^{\underline{0}}_{0}\) a multiplicative torus; see, e.g., the proof of [1, Lemma 4.1]). Since toric singularities are rational, we conclude that \(\overline{J}\) has rational singularities.

We also need to show that the direct image \(R^{i}p_{*} \mathcal {O}_{\overline{J}}\) is a locally free \({\mathcal O}_{S}\)-module of rank \(\left( {\begin{array}{c}g\\ i\end{array}}\right) \) whose formation commutes with base change. By Grauert’s theorem on cohomology and base change, it is enough to show \(h^{i}( \overline{J}_{K}, {\mathcal O}_{\overline{J}_{K}}) = h^{i}( \overline{J}_{0}, {\mathcal O}_{\overline{J}_{0}}) = \left( {\begin{array}{c}g\\ i\end{array}}\right) \). For \(J_{K}\), this is [25, Corollary 2, p. 121], and for \(\overline{J}_{0}\), it is [1, Theorem 4.3].

*S*-isomorphisms

*N*is the Néron model of \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}_{K}/K)\).

### Remark 4

Observe that in Corollary 3 the extension \((\overline{J}, J^{\underline{0}})\) is not unique because we do not require that \((\overline{J}_{K}, J_{K}^{\underline{0}}, \Theta _{K})\) extends to a family of stable semiabelic *pairs*. Consequently, for a given \((\overline{J}_{K}, J^{\underline{0}}_{K})\), there can be many extensions to a family \((\overline{J}, J^{\underline{0}})\) of stable semiabelic varieties, but by the corollary, all these extensions have isomorphic Picard varieties.

## 4 Autoduality for compactified Jacobians

Here we use Theorem 1, the comparison theorem, to prove that the compactified Jacobian of a nodal curve satisfies autoduality and furthermore that the autoduality isomorphism is induced by an Abel map when an Abel map exists. There are several different constructions of compactified Jacobians in the literature, and many of these are known to produce stable semiabelic varieties (e.g., [3, Theorem 5.1] states that the \(\phi \)-compactified Jacobians from [26] are stable semiabelic varieties), and for compactified Jacobians that are stable semiabelic varieties, we could deduce autoduality using Sect. 2, but here we give a self-contained proof.

We fix the spectrum *S* of a discrete valuation ring *R* with field of fractions *K* and residue field *k* that we assume has characteristic zero. We let *X* / *S* be a family of curves, \(J^{\underline{0}}/S\) the associated family of generalized Jacobians (or moduli spaces of multidegree 0 line bundles), and \(\overline{J}/S\) an associated family of compactified Jacobians.

Here we take a compactified Jacobian to be one of the moduli spaces constructed in [30]. In other words, we fix an integer *d* and a family *A* of ample line bundles on *X* / *S*, and let \(\overline{J}\) denote the *S*-projective scheme that universally corepresents the functor that assigns to a *S*-scheme *T* the set of isomorphism classes of families of degree *d* rank 1, torsion-free sheaves on \(X \times _{S} T\) that are semistable with respect to \(A \otimes _{S} {\mathcal O}_{T}\). The scheme \(\overline{J}\) exists by [30, Theorem 1.21]. (Note: The moduli space described in loc. cit. includes pure sheaves that fail to have rank 1, and \(\overline{J}\) is a connected component of this larger moduli space; when stability coincides with semistability, this is shown in [19, Section 4.2], and the semistable case can be treated by applying the argument in loc. cit. to a suitable Quot scheme.) We say that the special fiber \(\overline{J}_0\) is **fine** if every degree *d* semistable rank 1, torsion-free sheaf is stable, and otherwise we say \(\overline{J}_0\) is **coarse**.

While we limit our study to the moduli spaces from [30], the author expects the argument below is valid for the other compactified Jacobians that have been constructed. Indeed, the key results we use about \(\overline{J}\) are Propositions 5 and 6, and the proofs of these propositions remain valid for any family of compactified Jacobians that is a moduli space of rank 1, torsion-free sheaves that either is fine or is constructed using geometric invariant theory, and to the author’s knowledge, this includes all compactified Jacobians in the literature.

### 4.1 The singularities of a compactified Jacobian

When \(\overline{J}/S\) is a family of coarse compactified Jacobians, the Luna slice argument used in loc. cit. shows that there is a multiplicative torus \(\mathbf G _{m}^{b}\) acting on the ring appearing on the right-hand side of Eq. (9) such that the torus invariant subring is isomorphic to \(\widehat{{\mathcal O}}_{\overline{J}, x_0}\). Using this result, we prove:

### Proposition 5

\(\overline{J}\) has rational singularities, and \(\overline{J} \rightarrow S\) is flat.

### Proof

We can assume \(k=\overline{k}\) because it is enough to prove the result after passing from *R* to its strict henselization \(R^{\text {sh}}\). With this assumption, suppose first that \(\overline{J}/S\) is a family of fine compactified Jacobians. The morphism \(\overline{J} \rightarrow S\) is flat because the ring appearing in Eq. (9) is the quotient of a power series ring by elements whose images in \(\widehat{R}[[u_1, v_1, \dots , w_m]]/(\pi )\) form a regular sequence [22, Corollary to Theorem 22.5]. To see that \(\overline{J}\) has rational singularities, observe that \(\widehat{{\mathcal O}}_{\overline{J}, x_0}\) is isomorphic to the completion of \(k[u_1, v_1, \dots , u_n, v_n, w_1, \dots , w_m]/(u_1 v_1-u_2 v_2, \dots , u_1 v_1 - u_n v_n)\), which is the coordinate ring of an affine toric variety. (An isomorphism is determined by a choice of coefficient field \(k \subset R\).) Since toric varieties have rational singularities, so does \(\overline{J}\), proving the proposition when \(\overline{J}\) is fine.

When \(\overline{J}/S\) is coarse, the argument just given shows that if \(x_0 \in \overline{J}\) is a closed point, then \(\widehat{{\mathcal O}}_{\overline{J}, x_0}\) is the torus invariant subring of a ring that is *R*-flat and has rational singularities. In particular, \(\widehat{{\mathcal O}}_{\overline{J}, x_0}\) has rational singularities by [7, Corollary, p. 66] and is flat over *R* as it is a direct summand of a flat module.\(\square \)

*k*is algebraically closed and \(\overline{J}_0\) is a fine compactified Jacobian, the completed local ring of \(\overline{J}_0\) at a closed point \(x_0 \in \overline{J}_0\) is of the form

### Proposition 6

\(\overline{J}_{0}\) has Du Bois singularities.

### Proof

We can assume \(k=\overline{k}\). When \(\overline{J}_{0}\) is fine, Eq. (10) shows that the completed local ring of \(\overline{J}_0\) at a closed point \(x_0\) is a completed product of double normal crossing singularity rings and power series rings, and such a completed product is Du Bois by [14, Example 3.3, Theorem 3.9]. When \(\overline{J}_0\) is coarse, the completed local ring of \(\overline{J}_0\) at a closed point is a torus invariant subring of a Du Bois local ring and hence is itself Du Bois by [21, Corollary 2.4] (the left inverse hypothesis is satisfied because a torus invariant subring is a direct summand).\(\square \)

From Proposition 6, we deduce that \(\overline{J}/S\) satisfies Hypothesis 1:

### Corollary 7

The higher direct image \(R^{i}p_{*} {\mathcal O}_{\overline{J}}\) of \({\mathcal O}_{\overline{J}}\) under the projection \(p :\overline{J} \rightarrow S\) is a locally free \({\mathcal O}_{S}\)-module of rank \(g \atopwithdelims ()i\), and its formation commutes with arbitrary base chance.

### Proof

The fibers of \(\overline{J} \rightarrow S\) have Du Bois singularities, so the result is [13, Théorème 4.6] together with [25, Corollary 2, p. 121].\(\square \)

### Remark 8

The results in this section imply that Theorem 4 (the comparison theorem) applies to \(\overline{J}/S\). When \(\overline{J}\) is regular, or more generally semifactorial, the stronger result [27, Théoréme 9.3] applies, but \(\overline{J}/S\) can fail to be semifactorial, as the simple example of the degenerating elliptic curve from Remark 2 shows. (There we observed that the conclusion of [27, Théoréme 9.3] does not hold.)

### 4.2 Proof of autoduality

If *L* is a line bundle on *X* that extends \(L_K\), then the rule \(x \mapsto L(x)\) defines a morphism \(\alpha \) extending \(\alpha _K\) provided the fibers of *X* / *S* are irreducible [15, 2.2], but when \(X_0\) is reducible, the expression can fail to define a morphism because *L*(*x*) can fail to be semistable. The problem of constructing a *L* such that *L*(*x*) is always semistable (i.e., of constructing an Abel map for a reducible curve) is nontrivial. This and related problems are studied in [8–10, 12], and for further discussion on the topic, we direct the reader to those papers.

Regardless of whether the Abel map extends, Propositions 5 and 6 show that Hypothesis 1 holds for \(\overline{J}/S\), so we can form the family \({\text {Pic}}^{\underline{0}}(\overline{J}/S)\) of Picard schemes, and this family is related to the generalized Jacobian by an autoduality isomorphism:

### Corollary 9

### Proof

Since we have proven that \(\overline{J}\) satisfies Hypothesis 1, we complete the proof by arguing as in the last half of the proof of Corollary 3. The autoduality isomorphism must equal pullback by an Abel map when an Abel map is defined because both morphisms agree on the generic fiber.\(\square \)

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

Jesse Leo Kass was partially sponsored by the American Mathematical Society under an AMS–Simons Travel Grant, the Simons Foundation under Grant Number 429929, and the National Security Agency under Grant Number H98230-15-1-0264. The United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. This manuscript is submitted for publication with the understanding that the United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints. This work was started while the author was a Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter at the Institut für Algebraische Geometrie, Leibniz Universität Hannover. The author would like to Eduardo Esteves and Filippo Viviani for helpful conversations about autoduality, Karl Schwede for very helpful conversations about singularity theory, Frank Thorne and Nicola Pagani for helpful comments about exposition, and the anonymous referees for helpful feedback.

### Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Alexeev, V., Nakamura, I.: On Mumford’s construction of degenerating abelian varieties. Tohoku Math. J. (2)
**51**(3), 399–420 (1999)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Alexeev, V.: Complete moduli in the presence of semiabelian group action. Ann. Math. (2)
**155**(3), 611–708 (2002)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Alexeev, V.: Compactified Jacobians and Torelli map. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.
**40**(4), 1241–1265 (2004)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Arinkin, D.: Cohomology of line bundles on compactified Jacobians. Math. Res. Lett.
**18**(6), 1215–1226 (2011)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Arinkin, D.: Autoduality of compactified Jacobians for curves with plane singularities. J. Algebr. Geom.
**22**(2), 363–388 (2013)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Bosch, S., Lütkebohmert, W., Raynaud, M.: Néron models, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], vol. 21. Springer, Berlin (1990)Google Scholar
- Boutot, J.: Singularités rationnelles et quotients par les groupes réductifs. Invent. Math.
**88**(1), 65–68 (1987)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Caporaso, L.: Naturality of Abel maps. Manuscr. Math.
**123**(1), 53–71 (2007)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Caporaso, L., Coelho, J., Esteves, E.: Abel maps of Gorenstein curves. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo. (2)
**57**(1), 33–59 (2008)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Caporaso, L., Esteves, E.: On Abel maps of stable curves. Mich. Math. J.
**55**(3), 575–607 (2007)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Casalaina-Martin, S., Kass, J.L., Viviani, F.: The local structure of compactified Jacobians. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)
**110**(2), 510–542 (2015)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Coelho, J., Pacini, M.: Abel maps for curves of compact type. J. Pure Appl. Algebra
**214**(8), 1319–1333 (2010)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Du Bois, P.: Complexe de de Rham filtré d’une variété singulière. Bull. Soc. Math. France
**109**(1), 41–81 (1981)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Doherty, D.C.: Singularities of generic projection hypersurfaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.
**136**(7), 2407–2415 (2008)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Esteves, E., Gagné, M., Kleiman, S.: Autoduality of the compactified Jacobian. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)
**65**(3), 591–610 (2002)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Esteves, E., Kleiman, S.: The compactified Picard scheme of the compactified Jacobian. Adv. Math.
**198**(2), 484–503 (2005)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Esteves, E., Rocha, F.: Autoduality for treelike curves with planar singularities. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.)
**44**(3), 413–420 (2013)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kass, J.L.: Good Completions of Néron Models. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2009, Thesis (Ph.D.), Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Kass, J.L.: Two ways to degenerate the Jacobian are the same. Algebra Number Theory
**7**(2), 379–404 (2013). (English)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kleiman, S.L.: The Picard scheme. Fundamental algebraic geometry. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 123, pp. 235–321. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005)Google Scholar
- Kovács, S.J.: Rational, log canonical Du Bois singularities: on the conjectures of Kollár and Steenbrink. Compos. Math.
**118**(2), 123–133 (1999)View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Matsumura, H.: Commutative Ring Theory, 2nd edn, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 8, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989) (Translated from the Japanese by M. Reid)Google Scholar
- Melo, M., Rapagnetta, A., Viviani, F.: Fourier-Mukai and autoduality for compactified Jacobians. I. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles J.) (2017). doi:10.1515/crelle-2017-0009
- Melo, M., Rapagnetta, A., Viviani, F.: Fourier-Mukai and autoduality for compactified Jacobians II. (2012). arXiv:1308.0564
- Mumford, D.: Abelian Varieties. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics, vol. 5, Published for the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay; by Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2008, With appendices by C. P. Ramanujam and Yuri Manin, Corrected reprint of the second (1974) editionGoogle Scholar
- Oda, T., Seshadri, C.S.: Compactifications of the generalized Jacobian variety. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.
**253**, 1–90 (1979)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Pépin, C.: Modèles semi-factoriels et modèles de Néron. Math. Ann.
**355**(1), 147–185 (2013)MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Raynaud, M.: Spécialisation du foncteur de Picard. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 38, 27–76 (1970)Google Scholar
- Silverman, J.H.: Advanced Topics in the Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 151. Springer, New York (1994)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simpson, C.T.: Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety. I. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 79, 47–129 (1994)Google Scholar